A random assortment of media, puns, and feminism

"If you want to know what a person is like, take a good look at how they treat their inferiors, not their equals"

5,773 notes

lesbianpriority:

when we say trans women are male and trans men are female, we are not saying they deserve to be discriminated against or that their dysphoria doesn’t matter. we are saying biology exists and matters in certain contexts.

when we say we won’t date trans women because we’re lesbians, we are not saying trans women don’t deserve to have happy, fulfilling relationships. we are saying that we are not romantically or sexually attracted to them and so that neither of us would have a happy, fulfilling relationship if we dated.

when we say we are gender critical, we are not saying everyone should be gender-conforming. we are saying the opposite, that men and women should be free to dress and act however they like instead of being forced into certain gender roles based on their sex.

when we say female-only safe spaces are important, we are not saying trans-only or mixed safe spaces aren’t also important. we are saying that based on our biology, women have certain shared experiences and face specific oppression that we deserve to be able to discuss among ourselves.

when we say one thing and you hear another, that isn’t our fault. when you’re ready to listen to what we actually believe or to have a genuine discussion, we’ll still be here.

(via watermelinoe)

161 notes

ereini0n:

strange-boss:

“Bisexual actually means two or more genders! It’s always meant that!”

“Lesbian has always meant non-men for non-men. It’s always meant that!”

“Gay actually means non-women for non-women! It’s always meant that!”

“A woman is anyone who feels like one! It’s always meant that!”

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

(via watermelinoe)

217 notes

radicalcoffeeclub:

Some interesting news from India!

In its verdict, the court said that the wife had contributed equally towards acquiring family assets by doing domestic chores.

It said that the “contribution made by either the husband by earning or the wife by serving and looking after the family and children” would mean that “both are entitled equally to whatever they earned by their joint effort”.

It did not matter in whose name the property was bought - the spouse who looked and cared after the family would be entitled to an equal share in them.

The court also held that the woman’s domestic labour contributed indirectly to earning the money that enabled the purchase of the assets and that her work allowed the husband to be gainfully employed.

The wife works for 24 hours in various roles, including that of a chef, a “home doctor” and a “home economist”, the court said. In the absence of the homemaker’s duties, the husband would have to pay for the services these roles provided.

Women’s rights lawyer Flavia Agnes called it a “very positive judgement because it recognises women’s domestic labour”.

Malavika Rajkotia, a family and property lawyer, said the verdict was “a very important milestone”, one that women had been “trying to evolve and plead in their various cases”.

“This is, for the first time, a meaningful recognition of the homemaker’s right.”

So the hope is that the judgement could have a positive impact in future.

(via radicalbutter)

312 notes

chavaroses:

rad-by-nature:

Imagine reading about the Holocaust. I mean really fucking reading about it. Imagine knowing that there are still people to this day being arrested for their involvement. Survivors who can still show you parts of what happen on their body and tell you what they saw and who they lost. The German penal code prohibits publicly denying the Holocaust and disseminating Nazi propaganda, both off- and online. You see the Evidence of Crimes from the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial.

You look at that, and you go, “Damn. That’s exactly what I’m going through right now.”

Like dude, fuuuuuuuuuuuck you.

Makes me so angry, you can’t even imagine.

783 notes

lavenderfeminist:

Trying to get other people to understand that no amount of “brilliant” art an abusive and/or misogynistic man can offer the culture is worth more to me than the livelihood of any woman or girl devastated by his actions. For every famous abuser, there is a woman who had the same or better artistic potential but found herself stunted by trauma. For every legendary abuser, there is a woman who was never granted the same artistic or creative license or privilege by virtue of her sex, through no fault of her own. For every abuser, there is a woman who lives affected by the physical, mental, and emotional handprint of his actions for the rest of her life, and her life and safety is worth more than any man’s creative license, regardless of if she has anything to offer the public herself. I would erase every painting, every song, every essay, every sculpture, every novel, every poem, every film, every speech, everything crafted by the hands of abusive men in an instant if it meant erasing the pain experienced by women and girls at those same hands. And when the libraries and museums and music catalogues and movie theaters found themselves empty, I would fill them with the work of women.

(via catherine-montvoisin)

93 notes

menalez:

women on here argue about what the easiest feminist action could be, ranging from not shaving, not wearing make-up, to stuff like not dating men. in my opinion, there is far easier than those things and someone on here even failed at this extremely easy task: not being friendly with rapists. the bar is so low that a “radfem” on here genuinely tried to argue that she can’t just, Not be friends with a rapist. it’s one thing to want to fit in via shaving and makeup, or to fear being alone or want romantic companionship, but I Have To Be Friends With A Rapist Or I’ll Die Of Loneliness has to be the most pathetic example of non-action that radblr has ever witnessed

(via misandristdiarist)

2,817 notes

tickletrout:

theoldlesbianwithcats:

theoldlesbianwithcats:

I wonder if the reason why women, even those who call themselves feminists, don’t let go of sexist things in their lives like makeup, shaving, uncomfortable clothing and shoes, misogynistic media, even religion, is because most of them think they live a useless little life that has no influence on other people.

Does anyone remember Tumblr feminism from ten years ago that was about being a good role model for other women? The second it was replaced with pro-porn, pro-kink, pro-beauty industry, pro-plastic surgery, pro-religion “feminism” it was over, it became “who cares, as long as I like it”. “Influencer”, instead of being about speaking up about personal values and societal change, became synonymous with promoting weight loss products to insecure people.

In my experience, when I showed up at school or work without makeup, without a bra, with hairy armpits and legs, without even saying anything about it, several women would follow. When a popular, very dolled up student in my school admitted that she envied me, I told her that I would have her back. So she stopped wearing heels, even makeup, and started wearing sneakers and jeans. My niece is growing up knowing that women wear all sorts of colors and clothes, have body hair, can have short hair, don’t have to worry about their appearance, and hopefully, when the outside world inevitably teaches her that “beauty is pain” or even that beauty matters, she will laugh in their face.

(Speaking of laughing in someone’s face, a muslim (male) college classmate said after the Charlie Hebdo massacre that “people can spit on [his] mother, but they cannot make fun of the prophet”, causing quiet tension and anger in a classroom with a female-majority, until a woman yelled back “your mom is the one who gave birth to you, dumbass!!” All the women laughed and he never dared saying misogynistic nonsense like this to us again.)

Every time one woman rejects sexist standards, she gives other women the courage to do the same, she makes girls understand that those standards are not natural, they can be free. That’s why, once I rejected all of this, I never went back. (I didn’t even do it because of feminism, I just valued practicality and comfort more than obedience and conformity.)

Governments and billionaires are shaking in their boots because women have less and less children. The makeup and lingerie industries have to change because way less women have been wearing makeup and bras during lockdowns. When we are honest and firm about what we want and reject what we don’t like, that influences women around us and that influences society, that’s how change is made!

This got a lot of notes :D
I actually forgot a very obvious example : menstrual products!

Remember ten years ago, when pads and tampons were the only products out there, no one really questioned it, and if you bought a menstrual cup online and tried to discuss that possibility with your female friends or relatives you were considered a hippy weirdo? (bonus hippy weirdo vibes if you bought cloth pads or period underwear, a.k.a the exact same thing as my great-grandmother’s period rags, according to my mom) If you talked about putting free period products in public places, people would roll their eyes?

Now, in my country, you can buy menstrual cups, cloth pads and period underwear in supermarkets and one of the biggest underwear brands here started making menstrual underwear as well! Because women started to complain about the composition of pads and tampons, we now have perfume-free organic cotton pads and tampons, so even “classic” menstrual products improved. There are baskets with free period products in some public spaces like schools and universities. Along with food and hygiene products, now people think about donating period products for poor women.

If we had been too afraid of being seen as weirdos to talk about alternative menstrual products to female friends and relatives, we would still have no choice but dealing with pads and tampons with shady compositions and poor women would still be too ashamed to ask for donations of menstrual products.

That’s proof that we can all lead by example and that small changes can create bigger changes!

Small changes do change the world

small changes, we can do one or two. don’t have to do them all

“Every time one woman rejects sexist standards, she gives other women the courage to do the same, she makes girls understand that those standards are not natural, they can be free.”

Yes, courage call to courage, everywhere

(via aa-terf)

397 notes

plantbastard:

Heartbroken that the upcoming detrans documentary’s screening was canceled due to pressure from trans groups (who hadn’t even seen it and protested bc it was abt detransitioners).

Every day I see people actively pushing for the silence of anyone they see as dissenters- which has led to the combined dismissal/demonization of detransitioners. The vitriol towards detrans people supresses any actual research into HRT, it’s long term affects, and transition as a whole, and harms absolutely everyone. Plus it is vile. People who detransition face incredible backlash with no support, the exact opposite reaction than what the community gives when they transitioned, even though the support was promised to be based in love and self discovery. Most detransitioners are LGB, but are still made the enemy when they step away from transition or speak on negative experiences.

Suppressing detrans stories is actively harmful. There are more detransitioners than any of us know, and the longer people are afraid the more years we will lose to silence.

(via radfem-suggestion)

60,341 notes

mommyhorror:

blackswallowtailbutterfly:

back-not-broken:

saxifraga-x-urbium:

saxifraga-x-urbium:

image
image
image

https://twitter.com/vagina_museum/status/1628046312275935232

image

YEAH

That’s so cool, tell me: did these men’s parents consider them worth less than their brothers because they found out they had a uterus in middle/older age? Was it harder for them to attend college when they were younger because of their sex? Did they get catcalled on the street growing up, starting at age 12 when they began developing breasts? Do these men feel compelled to shave their legs and armpits now that they know they have a uterus? Did they ever need another man’s permission to open a bank account if they weren’t married yet? Did they struggle to retain their jobs after a pregnancy, or get groped on public transit?

Or did these men still benefit from male privilege their whole fucking lives despite their sex disorders because they’re still male, and their sex disorders mean jack shit when it comes to what a woman “is” or “isn’t”

These men knew they were men. Their families and friends still knew they were men. Their employers and religious leaders and teachers knew they were men.

And we know what a woman is even if she’s born without a uterus, or infertile, or had breast cancer and got a mastectomy, etc etc.

Don’t be dumb. Don’t try to act like you don’t know what a woman is, or what sexism is, or pretend misogyny doesn’t exist because a handful of men found out later in life they had sex disorders.

Did these men have ova? Did they grow up with the risk of becoming pregnant from normal penetrative sex? No. Rather they were the ones who impregnated.

Honestly the use of “cis” in the OP means nothing it comes off as a fake term. It is supposed to be a gotcha, vaguely scientific sounding term but it’s barely comprehensible

(via lavendeerlesbian)

945 notes

tiredbiird:

some atheists are like “yeah i don’t believe in god because it’s not material reality” and then be like “gender identity? so true bestie, tell me your pronouns”

(via womantichrist)